Sunday, February 23, 2020

Technology and a youth community(you chose) Essay

Technology and a youth community(you chose) - Essay Example This essay discusses how youth communities today utilize technology in order to sustain the community and maintain their identity. Special focus is on the UK Youth Climate Coalition. Youth communities make important contribution to development in a society. These mainly are forums or platforms that enable young people in the society to acquire different skills that are vital for effective participation in society. Different youth communities are concerned with different aspects in society. While some youth communities are concerned with climate, others might focus on drugs, education, gender, discrimination, rights and freedoms, politics, youth empowerment, and youth leadership, among others. Overall, youth communities today have a positive impact in society, as well as on the lives of the participating youth. Apart from developing various skills, the participating youth are also exposed to various opportunities, and learn to be responsible team players and leaders. Owing to the benefits of youth communities, it is therefore, important that they are sustained, and their collective identity is maintained. Nonetheless, technology remains a major way that promotes the identity and sustenance of youth communities. The UK Youth Climate Coalition is a UK-based youth organization formed in the year 2008 and comprises youth between the ages of 18 and 29. Run by unpaid volunteers, the UK Youth Climate Coalition focuses on the area of climate change and envisions a world in which the environment is well protected, clean, safe and sustainable for all humanity (UK Youth Climate Coalition Web). In order to realize this vision, the UK Youth Climate Coalition focuses on important areas such as education, energy, jobs and the economy, transport, as well as the international community; as these act as stepping stones to making the organization’s vision become a reality. As a considerably large and popular youth community, the UK Youth Climate Coalition

Friday, February 7, 2020

Routing Protocol Security Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Routing Protocol Security - Dissertation Example The Pervasive nature of the existing information infrastructure when coupled with cyber terrorism related threats makes the security of the network infrastructure an area of interest for network or computer security researchers. While a significant amount of research has been done on the content of security information, and software development, securing of the network infrastructure has increasingly become an issue of concern over the years.   The key critical infrastructure security entails securing of the routing infrastructure. According to Jones & Moigne   (2006) abuse of routine protocol and mechanism is perhaps the simplest available protocol-based attack. Recently, the emergence response team highlighted the imminent need for ensuring that routing infrastructure becomes secured (Yasser, 2007). According to Russell (2003) routers are widely used by intruders as common platforms for activity scanning. They are also reported to be less protected by the security policy (Tanen baum,   2003). For purposes of routing, the infrastructure is often categorized into two domains. These are inter-domain and intra-domain (IETF, John & Moy, 1998). Generally, the whole routing infrastructure entails a collection of the intra-domain routing regions often connected through the inter-domain functionality (John, 2005). An intra-domain routing environment, which is commonly referred to as the Autonomous System, is often administered using an administrative authority (John, 2005). As often is the case, this authority owns routers.... These are inter-domain and intra-domain (IETF, John & Moy, 1998). Generally, the whole routing infrastructure entails a collection of the intra-domain routing regions often connected through the inter-domain functionality (John, 2005). An intra-domain routing environment, which is commonly referred to as the Autonomous System, is often administered using an administrative authority (John, 2005). As often is the case, this authority owns routers within its domain although this does not necessarily include all the links that connect all the intra-domain routers. Within an automated system, the routing protocols that are most commonly deployed in Autonomous System, are the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) alongside the Intermediate-System-to-Intermediate System routing protocols. The two protocols are based upon the link-state routing OSPF v2 Routing protocol, which is a link-state routing protocol that was developed purposely for the internet Protocol networks. OSPF is often based upon the relative cost of transferring the information between hops such as the networks and routers. This protocol is, most often than not, categorized into an interior-Gateway protocol with an intension of running it internally in the AS (Cisco Systems Inc, 2009). This protocol is mostly distributed in the AS amongst various routers and it provides an allowance for building similar representation of the network topology belonging to AS. This is often realized through publishing (LSAs) or Link state Advertisement by routers (Cisco Systems Inc, 2009). The routers then construct a tree of shortest-path to various destinations maintaining itself as a root. It then routes the IP packets via the internet basing on the IP addresses. If a topological change